| 5 | | * Review of "Review of "Review of the review"" :) Tanya. Design is supposed to define if these links should be part of the task result. I really believe that you are very careful. But sometimes it is too much. Every section - analysis, design - has to be clear. It doesn't matter how it is explained, it always can be explained better. The reviewer has to decide if it is clear enough and if it is clear enough it should pass review with the appropriate mark. If the reviewer has something to add, let's he (she) decide what its importance is. And if it is not so important, let's task section pass review, not fail, because failing a task section (for example analysis) is an obstacle for faster task completion. Well, it doesn't mean that we don't have to be careful. What is more, some people have the problem of being on the opposite, too careless :) This is not a better approach. So, let's all of us be as critical as necessary; this is how we could manage to finish the iteration earlier and take a rest till the end of the iteration :) This was just an additional comment, because I believe everybody will read this tomorrow :) |
