Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of REPORTS

Timestamp:

10/09/08 15:51:44 (16 years ago)

Author:

peko

Comment:

--

REPORTS

@@ -6 +6 @@
 == Daily report ==
 
+=== Daily work reports: ===
+ * All reports should be put in a file named "<user>-<YYYY-MM-DD>.txt" where <user> is the user id, and the rest is the date of today in the iso format. 
+ * The naming is case sensitive. Example "tanya-2009-09-13.txt"
+ * The report should contain several lines, each describing performed activity. 
+ * Each activity should be described on a single line.
+ * You should be following the format strictly, or the report generating scripts will fail.
+
+Each line should be formated as:
+<activity> <task_id> <status> <time> [comment]
+
+<activity>: 
+* one of an, de, im, te, an-re, de-re, im-re, te-re, an2, de2, im2, te2, an-re2, de-re2, im-re2, te-re2, an3..
+* which means analisys, design, implementation, test, analisys-review, etc.
+* if a review fails, the index of the activity should increas (if "an-re" indicates that "an" fails, then the next is "an2" (which is reviewed in "an-re2", and so on)
+
+<task_id>:
+* either a real task ID (according to the WBS or wiki, like PLATFORM_STRUCTURE_R0)
+* or an UNTRACKED_BLA_BLA defining what you have done. 
+** In this case it should be something that has been nessecary, somehow, but is not a part of a task
+** Spending time in such things is bad indicator
+
+<status>:
+* If the activity is work (not review) the current progress is (after the performed work) in percentage. Like "30%", or "100%". Please give realistic estimates.
+* If the activity is review, use 1p, 2p, 3p, 4p, or 5p for the score of the review. 1p or 2p means not acceptable, 3p, 4p or 5p means acceptable.
+
+<time>:
+* time should always describe the ammount taken by the activity
+* you should use a number in minutes or hours
+* suffix the number with the used unit ('m' for minutes, 'h' for hours). You may use floating point. Examples:
+ * 20m
+ * 0.5h
+ * 12h
+
+<comment>:
+* Put a brief comment in free text. You can write whatever you want till the end of the line. In case of review, it can be only summary of the remarks given in the task log.
+
+Other notes:
+* if two members work together, they should both log in their reports the work.
+
+Example: (tanya-2008-09-22.txt)
+
+an-re PLATFORM_STRUCTURE_R0     2p 15m                          Unclear and a bit wrong (self conflicting).
+an-re PLUGIN_SUPPORT_LIB_BASE_R0 2p 5m                  Not on the template, not clear enough.
+an2 CORE_MVC_BASE_R0 100% 40m                                   Refactored.
+an2 BASE_MODEL_FRAME_CONTENT_R0 100% 40m                Refactored.
+de BASE_MODEL_FRAME_CONTENT_R0 100% 70m                 Should be ready.
+an-re PLATFORM_STANDARDS_REPOSITORY_R0 2p 15m   Some parts of the analysis are missing.
+an-re PRO_LIB_CORE_TUTORIAL_R0 2p 5m                    Does not apply to the template.
+an-re BASE_BOUND_CONTROLS_R0 2p 10m                     This analysis is for the whole task.
+an-re BOOK_WINDOW_R0 1p 0.25h                                   Does not apply to the template, other problems also.
+
+
 == Iteration report ==