Ticket #1450 (closed planned_task: obsolete)

Opened 14 years ago

Last modified 13 years ago


Reported by: Astea Owned by: deyan
Priority: 3 Milestone: M04_PRE4
Component: PROJECT_COMMUNITY Version: 2.0
Keywords: Cc:
Category: SCS Effort: 0.5
Importance: 60 Ticket_group:
Estimated Number of Hours: Add Hours to Ticket:
Billable?: Total Hours:
Analysis_owners: deyan Design_owners: deyan
Imp._owners: deyan Test_owners:
Analysis_reviewers: todor Changelog:
Design_reviewers: kyli Imp._reviewers: danvisel
Test_reviewers: Analysis_score: 3
Design_score: 3.5 Imp._score: 4
Test_score: 0


wiki page: SCS_FORUM_R3 - effort: 0.5d

Change History

comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by deyan

  • Owner changed from Astea to deyan
  • Design_score set to 0
  • Imp._score set to 0
  • Test_score set to 0
  • Analysis_score set to 0

comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by deyan

  • Status changed from new to s1a_analysis_started
  • Analysis_owners set to deyan


comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by deyan

  • Status changed from s1a_analysis_started to s1b_analysis_finished

Finished. The task may be overestimated but there is nothing to be done that i can think of

comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by todor

  • Status changed from s1b_analysis_finished to s1c_analysis_ok
  • Analysis_reviewers set to todor
  • Analysis_score changed from 0 to 3

the requirements are more appropriate for maintenance task, but there is not enough effort and its good that they're included here. maybe the had to be some indicator about that.

comment:5 Changed 14 years ago by deyan

  • Status changed from s1c_analysis_ok to s2a_design_started


comment:6 Changed 14 years ago by deyan

  • Design_owners set to deyan
  • Status changed from s2a_design_started to s2b_design_finished


comment:7 Changed 14 years ago by kyli

  • Status changed from s2b_design_finished to s2c_design_ok
  • Design_score changed from 0 to 3.5
  • Design_reviewers set to kyli

3.5p Good design. I guess that implementing a task before its design review is not a good practice.

comment:8 Changed 14 years ago by deyan

  • Status changed from s2c_design_ok to s3a_implementation_started
  • Imp._owners set to deyan

Totally agree, but implementation was revertible (actually Recycle bin forum was the only thing that was created and tested.) However , the forum is not so unusable in my opinion.

comment:9 Changed 14 years ago by deyan

  • Status changed from s3a_implementation_started to s3b_implementation_finished


comment:10 Changed 14 years ago by danvisel

  • Status changed from s3b_implementation_finished to s3c_implementation_ok
  • Imp._score changed from 0 to 4
  • Imp._reviewers set to danvisel

Seems like a good implementation. I'd suggest that calling the recycle bin "Locked and Obsolete Topics" sounds a little foreboding to English ears - "Old Topics" doesn't sound quite so scary. The RSS feed is useful - however, I'd point out that there isn't an obvious way for end-users (or even forgetful developers) to find that. This could be partially solved with a post in the FAQ announcing where to get RSS for the forums.

There is still the problem that people aren't using the forums, but I don't think that's the fault of this implementation - I think it's more of an organization problem. I also think this will change when the public starts looking at the site more often; it might be useful to add new posts from time to time just to make the forums seem more active. A lot of people are scared to post in a forum that looks like it's dead.

comment:11 Changed 13 years ago by deyan

  • Status changed from s3c_implementation_ok to closed
  • Resolution set to obsolete

Batch update from file query-obsoleted.csv

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.