Ticket #1475 (closed planned_task: obsolete)
SCS_TEST_TRACKING_MAINTENANCE_R1
Reported by: | Astea | Owned by: | deyan |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | 3 | Milestone: | M02_PRE2 |
Component: | PROJECT_COMMUNITY | Version: | 2.0 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Category: | SCS | Effort: | 0.5 |
Importance: | 90 | Ticket_group: | |
Estimated Number of Hours: | Add Hours to Ticket: | ||
Billable?: | Total Hours: | ||
Analysis_owners: | deyan | Design_owners: | deyan |
Imp._owners: | deyan,deyan | Test_owners: | |
Analysis_reviewers: | pav | Changelog: | |
Design_reviewers: | pav | Imp._reviewers: | pap |
Test_reviewers: | Analysis_score: | 3.5 | |
Design_score: | 3 | Imp._score: | 3 |
Test_score: | 0 |
Description (last modified by deyan) (diff)
wiki page: SCS_TEST_TRACKING_MAINTENANCE_R1 - effort: 0.5d
[[BackLinksMenu]] = Analysis = == Overview == Enter some tests script. They should be connected with tasks form the previous iteration. == Task requirements == Create accounts for the developers in tcw. Create a structure of tcw - Parent test cases. Include test cases for tasks that allow tests from previous iteration. Tasks from the previous iteration that can be included as test cases:[[BR]] [wiki:BASE_BOUND_CONTROLS_R0][[BR]] [wiki:APP_MAIN_WINDOW_R0][[BR]] [wiki:SCS_REPO_MIGRATE_R0][[BR]] [wiki:SCS_SITE_DESIGN_R0][[BR]] [wiki:SCS_FORUM_R0][[BR]] As testing SCS by creating, filling in and deleting items is not convenient, it may be added as a single test. Create an e-mail for the community server troubles, decide using current dev mail list or create a forum topic. == Task result == A test tracking structure(Parent tasks). >=3 usable test cases satisfying rules from [wiki:PLATFORM_STANDARDS_MANUAL_TESTS_R0]. Parent test cases should be needed. == Implementation idea == Structure: {{{ Sophie2 |-Sophie2 |--Platform |--Core |--Base |--Main |--Extra |--S2S |-SCS }}} See [source:/manage/sched/sophie2-wbs.py] and put test cases from Task requirements section into appropriate place in the structure. == Related == [wiki:SCS_TEST_TRACKING_MAINTENANCE_R0] == How to demo == Show the structure in tcw and created test cases. = Design = Apply the structure. {{{ Sophie2 |-Sophie2 |--Platform |--Core |--Base |--Main |--Extra |--S2S |-SCS }}} Check the python file and create required sections. Create administrator accounts for each team member. Create a forum topic with community server testing instructions. = Implementation = http://10.10.117.11/tcw/login.php Created the structure from implementation idea. Created following administrator accounts: "todor, deyan, pav, pap, pac, tanya, peko, milo, steve, dan". Ask for the password. Created 3 test cases - Bound Controls, APP_MAIN_WINDOW and Basic SCS features. Considering this task done, describing the test cases should be done after test phase for these tasks are done. Added [topic:12 Forum Topic] = Testing = = Comments = = Log = [[Include(wiki:SCS_TEST_TRACKING_MAINTENANCE_R1_LOG)]]
Change History
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Owner changed from Astea to deyan
- Status changed from new to analyzing
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from analyzing to analyzed
- Description modified (diff)
analysis and design passed, migrating to new workflow format
comment:3 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from analyzed to analysis_accepted
3.5p analysis and design passed, migrating to new workflow format
comment:4 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from analysis_accepted to designing
analysis and design passed, migrating to new workflow format
comment:5 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from designing to designed
analysis and design passed, migrating to new workflow format
comment:6 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from designed to design_accepted
3p analysis and design passed, migrating to new workflow format
comment:9 Changed 16 years ago by todor
- Status changed from implemented to analysis_accepted
2 by todor. The structure of design does not satisfy the requirements for design, copy part of the implementation ideas there if it is necessary. In the implementation part of the task there is no link to the result of this task, which makes its reviewing hard. One of the task requirements (mail to the dev group) is not fulfilled.
comment:10 follow-up: ↓ 11 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Owner changed from deyan to tosho
"Review: 2 by todor."Is this a review or a superreview? this design has already passed review, i am not refactoring it until it is clear.
comment:11 in reply to: ↑ 10 Changed 16 years ago by todor
- Owner changed from tosho to deyan
Replying to deyan:
"Review: 2 by todor."Is this a review or a superreview? this design has already passed review, i am not refactoring it until it is clear.
It's review of the implementation, this suppose reviewing both design and implementation.
comment:14 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from designed to design_accepted
expanding implementation
comment:15 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from design_accepted to implementing
expanding implementation
comment:17 Changed 16 years ago by pap
- Status changed from implemented to implementation_accepted
Review: 3. It's generally good but please change the link so that it uses domain names instead of IP addresses. Also 5/12 means nothing to me so please use more explanatory sentences.
comment:18 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from implementation_accepted to s3c_implementation_ok
repairing from invalid state
comment:19 Changed 16 years ago by pavlina
- Analysis_reviewers set to Pavlina
- Analysis_score set to 3.5
- Test_score set to 0
- Design_score set to 3
- Design_reviewers set to Pavlina
- Imp._score set to 0
comment:20 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Design_owners set to deyan
- Imp._owners set to deyan,deyan
- Analysis_owners set to deyan
added an,de,im owners
comment:22 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Design_reviewers changed from Pavlina to pav
- Analysis_reviewers changed from Pavlina to pav
Batch update from file newimport.csv
comment:23 Changed 15 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from s3c_implementation_ok to closed
- Resolution set to obsolete
Batch update from file query-obsoleted.csv
analysis and design passed, migrating to new workflow format