Ticket #218 (closed planned_task: obsolete)

Opened 11 years ago

Last modified 10 years ago

CORE_MVC_BASE_R2

Reported by: Astea Owned by: mitex
Priority: 3 Milestone: M07_ALPHA2
Component: CORE_FUNDAMENTALS Version: 2.0
Keywords: Cc: mitex
Category: CORE Effort: 1
Importance: 0 Ticket_group:
Estimated Number of Hours: Add Hours to Ticket:
Billable?: Total Hours:
Analysis_owners: bobi, mitex Design_owners: bobi, mitex
Imp._owners: bobi, mitex Test_owners:
Analysis_reviewers: pap Changelog:
Design_reviewers: pap Imp._reviewers: meddle
Test_reviewers: Analysis_score: 3
Design_score: 3 Imp._score: 3
Test_score: 0

Description

wiki page: CORE_MVC_BASE_R2 - effort: 1d

Change History

comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by mitex

  • Design_owners set to bobi, mitex
  • Status changed from new to s1a_analysis_started
  • Imp._owners set to bobi, mitex
  • Analysis_score set to 0
  • Test_score set to 0
  • Design_score set to 0
  • Owner changed from Astea to mitex
  • Imp._score set to 0
  • Analysis_owners set to bobi, mitex

comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by mitex

  • Status changed from s1a_analysis_started to s2c_design_ok

comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by mitex

  • Status changed from s2c_design_ok to s3a_implementation_started

comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by mitex

  • Status changed from s3a_implementation_started to s3b_implementation_finished

comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by meddle

  • Status changed from s3b_implementation_finished to new

What are you doing???
You have to make it through all the reviews, including the analysis part.

comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by mitex

  • Status changed from new to s1a_analysis_started

comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by mitex

  • Status changed from s1a_analysis_started to s1b_analysis_finished

comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by pap

  • Status changed from s1b_analysis_finished to s1c_analysis_ok
  • Analysis_reviewers set to pap
  • Analysis_score changed from 0 to 3
  • This certainly is not a good analysis.
  • It has missing sections
  • The requirements are actually more like implementation idea
  • I'll let it pass though

comment:9 Changed 10 years ago by mitex

  • Status changed from s1c_analysis_ok to s2a_design_started

comment:10 Changed 10 years ago by mitex

  • Status changed from s2a_design_started to s2b_design_finished

comment:11 Changed 10 years ago by pap

  • Cc mitex added
  • Status changed from s2b_design_finished to s2c_design_ok
  • I'll pass thi design but it surely is far from good
  • You haven't specified the name of the annotation
  • You haven't specified where it will be applied.
  • I am glad that there is some kind of a test :)

comment:12 Changed 10 years ago by mitex

  • Status changed from s2c_design_ok to s3a_implementation_started

comment:13 Changed 10 years ago by mitex

  • Status changed from s3a_implementation_started to s3b_implementation_finished

comment:14 Changed 10 years ago by meddle

  • Status changed from s3b_implementation_finished to s3c_implementation_ok
  • Design_score changed from 0 to 3
  • Design_reviewers set to pap
  • Imp._score changed from 0 to 3
  • Imp._reviewers set to meddle

Umm the implementation test works... So I guess it's usable, but you didn't fix your design and your code quality was bad... See GoodCodeExamples.

  • All the if, if else, else, etc.. blocks must be with curly brackets...
  • Some bad shaped JavaDoc...

3p (20m)

comment:15 Changed 10 years ago by deyan

  • Status changed from s3c_implementation_ok to closed
  • Resolution set to obsolete

Batch update from file query-obsoleted.csv

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.