Ticket #52 (closed planned_task: obsolete)
PLATFORM_NFR_EFFIECENCY_R1
Reported by: | Astea | Owned by: | nenko |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | 3 | Milestone: | M04_PRE4 |
Component: | SOPHIE_PLATFORM | Version: | 2.0 |
Keywords: | Cc: | nenko | |
Category: | unknown | Effort: | 0.5 |
Importance: | 10 | Ticket_group: | |
Estimated Number of Hours: | Add Hours to Ticket: | ||
Billable?: | Total Hours: | ||
Analysis_owners: | deyan | Design_owners: | nenko |
Imp._owners: | Test_owners: | ||
Analysis_reviewers: | gogov | Changelog: | |
Design_reviewers: | meddle | Imp._reviewers: | |
Test_reviewers: | Analysis_score: | 4 | |
Design_score: | 3.5 | Imp._score: | 0 |
Test_score: | 0 |
Description
wiki page: PLATFORM_NFR_EFFIECENCY_R1 - effort: 0.5d
Change History
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Category set to unknown
- Status changed from new to s1a_analysis_started
- Analysis_score set to 0
- Test_score set to 0
- Design_score set to 0
- Owner changed from Astea to deyan
- Imp._score set to 0
- Analysis_owners set to deyab
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from s1a_analysis_started to s1b_analysis_finished
- Analysis_owners changed from deyab to deyan
done
comment:3 Changed 16 years ago by gogov
- Status changed from s1b_analysis_finished to s1c_analysis_ok
- Analysis_reviewers set to gogov
- Analysis_score changed from 0 to 4
I'd add a few things:
- PRO_LIB_CORE_PERFORMANCE? and PRO_LIB_CORE_MEMORY_MANAGEMENT? might be affected from this task and get ideas on how to profile stuff
- the description of the proposed profiler is very ugly displayed in the wiki page on one very long line and reading is tedious
- also I could add that researching how to integrate automatic report generation into the build process could be added to this task
comment:4 Changed 16 years ago by nenko
- Owner changed from deyan to nenko
- Status changed from s1c_analysis_ok to s2a_design_started
comment:5 Changed 16 years ago by nenko
- Design_owners set to nenko
- Status changed from s2a_design_started to s2b_design_finished
comment:6 Changed 16 years ago by meddle
- Cc nenko added
- Design_score changed from 0 to 3.5
- Design_reviewers set to meddle
- Status changed from s2b_design_finished to s2c_design_ok
I think we should give a try to the TPTP framework, I'm happy with the researches made, but the TPTP does not have scheduled test execution, that is pointed as important in the analysis.
You didn't write anything about CLIF, that was in the implementation idea of the analysis, you tried it right? If you didn't tried is bad, because is good to try more then one alternative for that.
Aside of these things I think the design is good. 3.5p (30m)
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.