Ticket #138 (closed planned_task: obsolete)

Opened 14 years ago

Last modified 13 years ago

PRO_LIB_CORE_PERFORMANCE_R0

Reported by: Astea Owned by: gogov
Priority: 3 Milestone: M03_PRE3
Component: PRO_LIB_CORE Version: 2.0
Keywords: Cc:
Category: CORE Effort: 1
Importance: 30 Ticket_group:
Estimated Number of Hours: Add Hours to Ticket:
Billable?: Total Hours:
Analysis_owners: niki, gogov Design_owners:
Imp._owners: Test_owners:
Analysis_reviewers: boyan,gogov,boyan Changelog:
Design_reviewers: Imp._reviewers:
Test_reviewers: Analysis_score: 4
Design_score: 0 Imp._score: 0
Test_score: 0

Description

wiki page: PRO_LIB_CORE_PERFORMANCE_R0 - effort: 1d

Change History

comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by deyan

  • Category set to BASE
  • Design_score set to 0
  • Imp._score set to 0
  • Test_score set to 0
  • Analysis_score set to 0

Adding category

comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by peko

  • Importance changed from 0 to 30

comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by deyan

  • Category changed from BASE to CORE

Correcting category

comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by niki

  • Owner changed from Astea to niki
  • Status changed from new to s1a_analysis_started
  • Analysis_owners set to niki

taken

comment:5 Changed 14 years ago by niki

  • Status changed from s1a_analysis_started to s1b_analysis_finished

comment:6 Changed 14 years ago by boyan

  • Status changed from s1b_analysis_finished to new
  • Analysis_reviewers set to boyan
  • Analysis_score changed from 0 to 2

You need to change the following things:

  • Add the task name to the ticket query (where it says TASK_NAME_HERE) so that the ticket is displayed.
  • The research for bottlenecks is part of the design and implementation phases and should not be in a separate document.
  • There might not be enough time for making new tests at this revision - list this as an optional task requirement.
  • 1d is not enough for going to the code and reviewing algorithms - better use some kind of profiler to measure the performance (see PLATFORM_NFR_EFFIECENCY_R0 for some ideas).
  • I think that PRO_LIB_CORE_MEMORY_MANAGEMENT_R0 and PLATFORM_NFR_EFFIECENCY_R0 should be added to the Related section.
  • The How to demo section might include showing the results from the profiler before and after the improvements.
  • Improve your English :)

comment:7 Changed 14 years ago by niki

  • Status changed from new to s1a_analysis_started

comment:8 Changed 14 years ago by niki

  • Status changed from s1a_analysis_started to s1b_analysis_finished

made some changes

comment:9 Changed 14 years ago by gogov

  • Status changed from s1b_analysis_finished to new
  • Analysis_reviewers changed from boyan to boyan, gogov
  • In each section where you list multiple things which should be done or noted or whatever, separate them in a more readable form with the appropriate bullets and indentation. Fix them.
  • The task's name is about "performance", so no need to use "efficiency", because this could cause ambiguities and raise questions from the person who reads the analysis
  • Make a note on what kind of performance is measured/optimized - runtime or memory (or something else?)
  • Improve your English even more for obvious mistakes, so it's easier to read (:

comment:10 Changed 14 years ago by gogov

  • Owner changed from niki to gogov

comment:11 Changed 14 years ago by gogov

  • Status changed from new to s1a_analysis_started

comment:12 Changed 14 years ago by gogov

  • Status changed from s1a_analysis_started to s1b_analysis_finished

comment:13 Changed 14 years ago by gogov

  • Analysis_owners changed from niki to niki, gogov

comment:14 Changed 14 years ago by boyan

  • Status changed from s1b_analysis_finished to s1c_analysis_ok
  • Analysis_reviewers changed from boyan, gogov to boyan,gogov,boyan
  • Analysis_score changed from 2 to 4

The analysis is clear and detailed, with correct task requirements.

comment:15 Changed 13 years ago by peko

  • Ticket_group set to GROUP_BASE_SKINS_R0

comment:16 Changed 13 years ago by peko

  • Ticket_group GROUP_BASE_SKINS_R0 deleted

comment:17 Changed 13 years ago by deyan

  • Status changed from s1c_analysis_ok to closed
  • Resolution set to obsolete

Batch update from file query-obsoleted.csv

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.