Ticket #1580 (closed unplanned_task: obsolete)
UNPLANNED_DEVELOPMENT_OVERVIEW_R0
| Reported by: | orliin | Owned by: | kyli |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | M02b_PRE2b |
| Component: | SOPHIE_PLATFORM | Version: | 2.0 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Category: | unknown | Effort: | 3 |
| Importance: | 90 | Ticket_group: | |
| Estimated Number of Hours: | Add Hours to Ticket: | ||
| Billable?: | Total Hours: | ||
| Analysis_owners: | boyan | Design_owners: | kyli,boyan |
| Imp._owners: | kyli,boyan | Test_owners: | |
| Analysis_reviewers: | todor | Changelog: | |
| Design_reviewers: | pav,tanya,pap | Imp._reviewers: | -orliin,pap |
| Test_reviewers: | Analysis_score: | 3.5 | |
| Design_score: | 3.5 | Imp._score: | 3 |
| Test_score: | 0 |
Description (last modified by orliin) (diff)
wiki page: UNPLANNED_DEVELOPMENT_OVERVIEW_R0 - effort: 3d
Change History
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by boyan
- Owner set to boyan
- Status changed from new to s1a_analysis_started
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by boyan
- Status changed from s1a_analysis_started to s1b_analysis_finished
comment:3 Changed 16 years ago by todor
- Status changed from s1b_analysis_finished to s1c_analysis_ok
3.5 by todor. The analysis is good enough.
comment:4 Changed 16 years ago by kyli
- Owner changed from boyan to kyli
- Status changed from s1c_analysis_ok to s2a_design_started
comment:5 Changed 16 years ago by boyan
- Status changed from s2a_design_started to s2b_design_finished
comment:7 Changed 16 years ago by pavlina
- Status changed from s2b_design_finished to s1c_analysis_ok
2p. I don't like the setup section. If this section is for loading sophie so writing reports must not be there and you should note that only astea workers write reports. May be this should be in the tasks paragraph section. The repository structure which is part of PLATFORM_STRUCTURE must be described in repository section. It is necessary for the page to have Comments section and may be it should be good if the design contains the creation of the wiki page and the basic sections it should have. The requirement Internal information should not be widely accessible is not fulfilled in the design.
comment:8 Changed 16 years ago by boyan
- Owner changed from kyli to boyan
- Status changed from s1c_analysis_ok to s2a_design_started
redesigning
comment:9 Changed 16 years ago by boyan
- Status changed from s2a_design_started to s2b_design_finished
comment:10 Changed 16 years ago by todor
- Status changed from s2b_design_finished to s2c_design_ok
- Design_score set to 0
- Imp._score set to 0
- Test_score set to 3
- Analysis_score set to 0
The information is enough.
comment:11 Changed 16 years ago by kyli
- Owner changed from boyan to kyli
- Status changed from s2c_design_ok to s3a_implementation_started
comment:12 Changed 16 years ago by boyan
- Design_owners set to kyli,boyan
- Imp._owners set to kyli,boyan
- Analysis_score changed from 0 to 3.5
- Test_score changed from 3 to 0
- Design_score changed from 0 to 3
- Analysis_owners set to boyan
comment:14 Changed 16 years ago by boyan
- Status changed from s3a_implementation_started to s3b_implementation_finished
implementation total (boyan): 6h
comment:15 Changed 16 years ago by orliin
- Status changed from s3b_implementation_finished to s3c_implementation_ok
- Imp._score changed from 0 to 4
- Description modified (diff)
- Reporter changed from boyan to orliin
- Imp._reviewers set to orliin
effort: 45m
Implementation score reasons:
In the Accounts part:
How to give the skype and phone information or who to give it to?
'svn' and 'TRAC' can be links to the lower sections of the page?
In the Development issues part:
There are no links to pages with deeper explanations of the bullets
General thing:
Links for sites outside the wiki should open in a new tab or window
comment:16 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
This task has not revisions! Why?
comment:17 Changed 16 years ago by todor
- Status changed from s3c_implementation_ok to s2c_design_ok
there are some important things missing and this task is vital for getting into the procees
comment:18 Changed 16 years ago by todor
- Imp._score changed from 4 to 1
implementation score set to 1
comment:19 Changed 16 years ago by milo
- Imp._score changed from 1 to 2
- Imp._reviewers changed from orliin to -orliin
super-review - The result is not good enough:
- There should be one paragraph of overview around each linked page
- Lots of things are just noted (even without a link).
- There should be several sentences text in each section, before the content.
- There are lots of things missed. Please have a look at the video of the second day of the discussions at Sheraton. Lots of things from it should go here.
The most important thing, is that, this document is not nice to read. It looks more like a plan for something. Other problem is the overall structure/order. It should be structured more systematically (like the project/product/process approach used in the discussions at Sheraton).
note to todor: please, follow the process and update all the data at once, when you do a super-review. The comments above should be added to there, and some of the fields should be updated.
comment:20 Changed 16 years ago by kyli
- Status changed from s2c_design_ok to s3a_implementation_started
- Imp._owners changed from kyli,boyan to kyli,boyan,kyli
Implementation will be thoroughly rewritten(according to the design and the notes in the super review), I will watch again the video from Shetaron :) The task should be completed until tomorrow evening.
comment:21 Changed 16 years ago by kyli
- Status changed from s3a_implementation_started to s3b_implementation_finished
done in about 5 hours.
comment:22 Changed 16 years ago by Tanya
- Status changed from s3b_implementation_finished to s1c_analysis_ok
- Design_score changed from 3 to 2
- Design_reviewers changed from Pavlina to Pavlina,Tanya
The design is not good enough.
1) Correct the mistakes in the wiki pages listed in the Related section.
2) Get rid of internal infromation that is publicly accessible.
These are more appropriate for Analysis, not for Design. The design should answer these questions.
comment:24 Changed 16 years ago by kyli
- Status changed from s2a_design_started to s2b_design_finished
dine (20m).
comment:25 Changed 16 years ago by pap
- Status changed from s2b_design_finished to s2c_design_ok
- Design_score changed from 2 to 3.5
- Design_reviewers changed from Pavlina,Tanya to Pavlina,Tanya.pap
comment:26 Changed 16 years ago by kyli
- Status changed from s2c_design_ok to s3a_implementation_started
comment:27 Changed 16 years ago by kyli
- Status changed from s3a_implementation_started to s3b_implementation_finished
There are no changes to the previous implementation, since there are no remakrs about it in the last review.
comment:28 Changed 16 years ago by kyli
- Design_reviewers changed from Pavlina,Tanya.pap to Pavlina,Tanya,pap
- Imp._owners changed from kyli,boyan,kyli to kyli,boyan
- Analysis_reviewers set to todor
comment:29 Changed 16 years ago by pap
- Status changed from s3b_implementation_finished to s3c_implementation_ok
- Imp._score changed from 2 to 3
- Imp._reviewers changed from -orliin to -orliin,pap
It is sufficient in my opinion.
comment:30 Changed 16 years ago by todor
- Category set to unknown
- Summary changed from UNPLANNED_DEVELOPMENT_OVERVIEW to UNPLANNED_DEVELOPMENT_OVERVIEW_R0
added revision in the task name to fit the standards
comment:31 Changed 16 years ago by tanya
- Design_reviewers changed from Pavlina,Tanya,pap to Pavlina,tanya,pap
comment:32 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Design_reviewers changed from Pavlina,tanya,pap to pav,tanya,pap
Batch update from file newimport.csv
comment:33 Changed 15 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from s3c_implementation_ok to closed
- Resolution set to obsolete
Batch update from file query-obsoleted.csv
