Ticket #1592 (closed unplanned_task: obsolete)
UNPLANNED_PLATFORM_STANDARDS_GENERAL_R0
| Reported by: | deyan | Owned by: | boyan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | M03_PRE3 |
| Component: | PROCESS | Version: | 2.0 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Category: | PLATFORM | Effort: | 2 |
| Importance: | 90 | Ticket_group: | GROUP_PLATFORM_STANDARDS_R0 |
| Estimated Number of Hours: | Add Hours to Ticket: | ||
| Billable?: | Total Hours: | ||
| Analysis_owners: | deyan | Design_owners: | boyan |
| Imp._owners: | boyan | Test_owners: | |
| Analysis_reviewers: | boyan | Changelog: | |
| Design_reviewers: | deyan | Imp._reviewers: | deyan |
| Test_reviewers: | Analysis_score: | 4 | |
| Design_score: | 3.5 | Imp._score: | 3.5 |
| Test_score: | 0 |
Description
Change History
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Owner set to deyan
- Status changed from new to s1a_analysis_started
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from s1a_analysis_started to s1b_analysis_finished
40m
comment:3 Changed 16 years ago by boyan
- Status changed from s1b_analysis_finished to new
- Analysis_reviewers set to boyan
- Analysis_owners set to deyan
- Analysis_score changed from 0 to 2
- There are tasks for testing standards in this revision, contrary to what the overview says. This information is misleading and should be removed.
- An analysis might be structured according to the standards, but the information in it might still not be correct (irrelevant task requirements, etc.) - how is that handled (I think this should also be mentioned in the standards)?
- Although not a requirement, it would be nice to have all occurences of the wiki pages to be linked with a ...? tag (seems you have ommited the "wiki:" part).
- Don't forget to fill your name in the analysis owners field next time.
comment:4 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from new to s1a_analysis_started
If you state that the information in the analysis is not correct, please point exactly what is not ok excluding the overview.
comment:5 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from s1a_analysis_started to s1b_analysis_finished
done
comment:6 Changed 16 years ago by boyan
- Status changed from s1b_analysis_finished to s1c_analysis_ok
- Analysis_reviewers changed from boyan to boyan,boyan
- Analysis_score changed from 2 to 4
There was a misunderstanding with point 2 in my previous comment. The analysis is ok. (10m)
comment:7 Changed 16 years ago by boyan
- Owner changed from deyan to boyan
- Status changed from s1c_analysis_ok to s2a_design_started
taken for design
comment:8 Changed 16 years ago by boyan
- Design_owners set to boyan
- Status changed from s2a_design_started to s2b_design_finished
done in 1h
comment:9 Changed 16 years ago by boyan
- Design_owners set to boyan
- Version set to 2.0
- Analysis_score changed from 2 to 4
Due to a bug(?) in the Trac, the design owners and analysis score fields have not been updated the last time
comment:10 Changed 16 years ago by boyan
- Ticket_group set to GROUP_PLATFORM_STANDARDS_R0
grouping tasks
comment:11 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from s2b_design_finished to s3c_implementation_ok
- Design_score changed from 0 to 3.5
- Imp._score changed from 0 to 3.5
Old task, implementation is finished and is acceptable.
comment:12 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Design_reviewers set to deyan
- Imp._owners set to boyan
- Imp._reviewers set to deyan
comment:13 Changed 15 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from s3c_implementation_ok to closed
- Resolution set to obsolete
Batch update from file query-obsoleted.csv
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
