Ticket #1437 (closed planned_task: obsolete)
SCS_PROJECT_BLOG_R2
| Reported by: | Astea | Owned by: | todor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | 3 | Milestone: | M03_PRE3 |
| Component: | PROJECT_COMMUNITY | Version: | 2.0 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Category: | SCS | Effort: | 1 |
| Importance: | 60 | Ticket_group: | |
| Estimated Number of Hours: | Add Hours to Ticket: | ||
| Billable?: | Total Hours: | ||
| Analysis_owners: | kyli | Design_owners: | todor |
| Imp._owners: | todor | Test_owners: | |
| Analysis_reviewers: | todor | Changelog: | |
| Design_reviewers: | kyli | Imp._reviewers: | danvisel |
| Test_reviewers: | Analysis_score: | 3 | |
| Design_score: | 3.5 | Imp._score: | 3 |
| Test_score: | 0 |
Description
wiki page: SCS_PROJECT_BLOG_R2 - effort: 1d
Change History
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Category set to SCS
- Design_score set to 0
- Imp._score set to 0
- Test_score set to 0
- Analysis_score set to 0
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by kyli
- Owner changed from Astea to kyli
- Status changed from new to s1a_analysis_started
- Analysis_owners set to kyli
comment:3 Changed 16 years ago by kyli
- Status changed from s1a_analysis_started to s1b_analysis_finished
done(20m).
comment:4 Changed 16 years ago by todor
- Status changed from s1b_analysis_finished to s1c_analysis_ok
- Analysis_reviewers set to todor
- Analysis_score changed from 0 to 3
maybe the first release and the new teams should be mentioned, and not so much emphasize on the used technologies, because the technologies we're using are common for the whole project and there is information about them in the development overview. the emphasize should be on our current status and our progress during the last iteration.
comment:5 Changed 16 years ago by kyli
I was just using the structure, defined in the first revision of this task :)
comment:6 Changed 16 years ago by todor
- Design_owners set to todor
- Owner changed from kyli to todor
- Status changed from s1c_analysis_ok to s2a_design_started
taken
comment:7 Changed 16 years ago by todor
- Status changed from s2a_design_started to s2b_design_finished
finished in only 1h, because the contents of the mail were used.
comment:8 Changed 16 years ago by kyli
- Status changed from s2b_design_finished to s2c_design_ok
- Design_score changed from 0 to 3.5
- Design_reviewers set to kyli
Is it necessary to send two different posts? The second is just 3 sentences long.. However, this is not fatal :) 3.5p
comment:9 Changed 16 years ago by todor
- Status changed from s2c_design_ok to s3a_implementation_started
- Imp._owners set to todor
taken
comment:10 Changed 16 years ago by todor
- Status changed from s3a_implementation_started to s3b_implementation_finished
there are two posts, because the one is progress report and the other gives information to the developer community about the videos
comment:11 Changed 16 years ago by danvisel
- Status changed from s3b_implementation_finished to s3c_implementation_ok
- Imp._score changed from 0 to 3
- Imp._reviewers set to danvisel
Same thing that I said on the 1461:
I think this is basically pretty good. I do suggest that in the future we proofread it in English first - I'd be happy to go over things, I'm sure Nick wouldn't mind either - just to make sure that there aren't any big errors. You could flag me down on the Skype chat or send me an email - it would only take me five minutes to go over things, and I don't mind doing it.
I do think proofreading is important because this is how the world finds out about what we're doing & we don't want them to jump to the wrong conclusions because of typos.
The video post is a little bit confusing in English - Nick had me edit this to straighten out the sentences so that USC wouldn't be confused when they looked at the site.
comment:12 Changed 15 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from s3c_implementation_ok to closed
- Resolution set to obsolete
Batch update from file query-obsoleted.csv
Adding category and importance