wiki:ITERATION_01
Last modified 9 years ago Last modified on 10/08/08 15:43:48

Iteration page for M01_PRE1

Autogenerated - DO NOT EDIT!

Overview

total effort: 82
milestone page: M01_PRE1

Planned Tasks

SCS_BACKUP_R0 - 0.5d - #1373 - (LOG)

  • Analyzing : Pacitu ( done 25m)
  • Analyzing 2: Deyan (done: 5m)
  • Designing : Pacitu (done 20m)
  • Implementing : Pacitu (done 10m)
    • Review: Milo - 2 - will be ready when the backup is performed (end of sprint is good time for this)
  • Implementing 2 : Deyan (done 20m) The Backup CD was created.
    • Review: 3.5 by todor. The back up is complete.
  • Testing :
SCS_SITE_DESIGN_R0 - 1d - #1365 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Deyan(done: 30 min)
    • Refactoring : Deyan(done: 5 min)
    • Review: 3 by todor
  • Designing : Pacitu
    • Review: 3.5 by todor
  • Implementing : pacitu (done: 4h)
    • Review: 3.5 by todor
  • Testing :
SCS_ISSUE_TRACKER_MAINTENANCE_R0 - 1d - #1407 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pacitu ( done 25m )
    • Refactoring: Deyan ( done 5m )
  • Analyzing 2: Peko ( done 15m )
    • Review: 3.5 by Tanya ( done 10m )
  • Designing : Peko ( done 5m )
    • Review: 3.5 by Tanya ( done 10m )
  • Designing 2: Pacitu ( done 10m )
  • Implementing : Peko, Pacitu( done 1h )
    • Review: 3 by Pacitu ( done 1m )
  • Testing :
SCS_FORUM_R0 - 0.5d - #1447 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Tanya, toshko - 15 min
    • Refactoring: Deyan (done: 5 mins)
  • Designing : Pacitu
  • Implementing :Pacitu & Pavlina
    • review 4 by Tanya
  • Testing :
PLATFORM_STANDARDS_ANALYSIS_R0 - 1d - #23 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pavlina, Todor(done: 25 mins)
  • Designing : pap, todor
  • Implementing : pap, todor
    • Review: 4 by Tanya
  • Testing : ---
PRO_LIB_CORE_TUTORIAL_R0 - 2d - #129 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pap - done (45min)
    • Review: 2 by Tanya - 5 min. The page doesn't apply to the template. It is not clear now what should be done for finishing the task.
  • Analyzing 2: Peko - done (30 min)
    • Review: 3.5 by todor. Now the analysis is done according to the template, and the results of it are clear.
  • Designing : Tanya - 30min
    • Review : 3.5 by Pap.
  • Implementing : Tanya - 13h
    • Review : 3 by Pap - 30m. Should be more explanatory so it is easier to understand for newcomers.
  • Testing :
BASE_BOUND_CONTROLS_R0 - 2d - #254 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pap - done (35 min)
    • Review: 2 by Tanya - 10min. It is incorrect. The analysis must cover what should be done only through the current revision. This analysis is for the whole task.
  • Analyzing 2: Peko - done (30 mins)
    • Review: 3.5 by Tanya -10m
  • Designing : Peko - 3.5h - done.
    • Review: 4 by Pap - 10m. OK
  • Implementing : Peko 3.5h
  • Implementing 2 : Peko 4h - done.
    • Review: 3.5 by Pavlina - 30 mins
  • Testing :
SCS_TEST_TRACKING_MAINTENANCE_R0 - 0.5d - #1474 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : deyan (done : 30 minutes)
    • Review: 3.5 by Tanya. Fix "How to demo".
    • Analysis refactor : deyan (done : 20 minutes)
  • Designing : Deyan (done : 5 minutes)
  • Implementing : Deyan (done : 10 minutes)
    • Review: 4 by todor. Everything is OK.
  • Testing :
PROCESS_R0 - 4d - #1564 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pavlina, Todor(done: 20 mins)
    • Refactoring: Deyan (done: 5 mins)
  • Analysis Review: 3 - OK - Peko (5 mins)
  • Designing : Pavlina (done: 30 mins)
  • Design Review: 3 - OK - Peko (5 mins)
  • Implementing : Pavlina
  • Implementation Review: 4 - OK - Peko (55 mins)
  • Super Review: milo - 2 - The whole structure needs to be reviewed, lots of things are not for here (should be placed in other places)!
  • Implementing 2: Peko - done - 5m - Some things removed from PROCESS(they already existed in PLATFORM_STANDARDS_CODE_R0)
    • Review: 3.5 by todor. Added links for some docs that weren't ready when this task was in implementation phase. Things that weren't for here are already removed.
  • Testing :
SCS_WIKI_MAINTENANCE_R0 - 0.5d - #1423 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pacitu ( done 25m )
    • Review: 2 by Tanya - The analysis doesn't apply to the template. For example the part "How to demo" is missing.
    • Analyzing 2: Deyan (done 15m)
  • Designing : Pacitu (done 15m)
    • Review: 4 by Tanya - OK
  • Implementing : Peko (done 50m)
    • Review: 2 by Deyan (done 2m) - Implementation is done, but there is nothing in Implementation section.
  • Implementing 2: Deyan (done 50m)
  • Implementing 3: Deyan (done 1.5h) General review of all tasks, corrected implementation section and other fixes. See http://10.10.117.11:8000/sophie2/wiki/ITERATION_01?version=170 , bottom of the document.
    • Review: 4 by todor. All sections of the task are clear. All that had to be done is done.
  • Testing :
INTERNAL_BACKLOG_MAINTENANCE_R0 - 2d - #1552 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Deyan, Pacitu - done - 10 min
    • Review: 1 by todor. Not according to the template. No information about how to maintain the backlog.
  • Analyzing 2: deyan (done: 35 min)
  • Designing : todor
  • Implementing : todor
  • Review - 3.5 by Deyan (done: 25 minutes)
  • Testing :
SCS_REPO_MIGRATE_R0 - 2d - #1402 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pacitu - done - 25min
  • Analyzing 2: Peko - done - 25min
    • Refactoring: Deyan (done: 5 mins)
  • Designing : Pacitu
  • Implementing : Pacitu, Peko
  • Design-Review: milo - 2 - How to demo need more improvement. Analisys is BAD - does not answer where the result will be, requirements are wrong... etc. Implementation should provide a link to the result.
  • Design-Review: milo - 4 - Ok. Just give examples about what is in manage.
  • Implementation-Review: milo - 3 - sophie2-platform was commited as sophie-platform. Be more careful!
  • Testing :
SCS_MAIL_LIST_R0 - 0.5d - #1459 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Tanya, toshko - 20 min
  • Designing : Pacitu
  • Implementing : Pavlina - 50 mins
  • Review: Peko - 5 min 3 - OK
  • Super-Review: - 2 - what the results are? Keep the format.
  • Implementing refactoring: Deyan (done: 20m) - due to Super-Review added groups' addresses (links) and information about subscription. Added current users in groups.
  • Analyzing 2: (refactoring) Peko - 5 min - must be fixed already.
  • Review: 3.5 by todor. All past issues have been resolved.
  • Testing :
PLATFORM_INFRASTRUCTURE_OVERVIEW_R0 - 2d - #11 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pavlina, Dean(done: 25 mins)
    • Refactoring: Deyan(done: 20 mins)
    • Review: Peko - 4 - OK - (25 mins)
    • Review: 4 by Tanya - 5min
  • Designing : Pavlina(done: 30 mins)
    • Review: 4 by Tanya - 5min
  • Implementing :Pavlina (done: 9h)
    • Review: 4 by Tanya - 1h
  • Testing :
PLUGIN_EDITIONS_STRUCTURE_R0 - 1d - #108 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Dean, Pavlina(done: 20 mins)
  • Analyzing 2: Peko - done 15 mins
  • Designing : Pavlina - 30 mins
  • Implementing :Pavlina - 2d
    • Review - Peko - 3 - 10 mins - Plugins cannot be turned off so that sophie2 is running.
  • Testing :
PLUGIN_MODULE_STRUCTURE_R0 - 3d - #104 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pap - done (2h) - Tanya 40 min refactor
    • Review: 1 by Tanya. The analysis is incorrect.
  • Analyzing 2: Pav (done: 20 mins)
    • Review: 3.5 by Tanya. - 30min (review + refactor)
  • Designing : Tanya & Pavlina - 1h
  • Implementing : Pavlina - 3d
    • Review : Peko - 4 - OK - 15 mins
  • Testing :
SCS_ISSUE_TRACKER_SETUP_R0 - 3d - #1404 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pacitu - done - 25min
    • Refactoring: Deyan (done : 5 mins)
  • Analyzing 2: Peko - done 20 min
  • Designing : Peko 180 min
  • Implementing : Peko, Pacitu 300 mins
    • Review: 3,5 by todor
  • Testing :
PLATFORM_DEPLOYMENT_BUILD_ECLIPSE_R0 - 0.5d - #65 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing :Pavlina, Todor(done: 15 mins)
  • Designing : Pavlina
  • Implementing : Pavlina
    • Review: 3 by todor
  • Testing :
PLATFORM_STANDARDS_MANUAL_TESTS_R0 - 1d - #39 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pavlina, Todor(15 mins)
  • Designing : todor
  • Implementing : todor
    • Review: 3.5 by Pav
  • Testing :
SCS_TEST_TRACKING_SETUP_R0 - 2d - #1471 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : deyan (done : 35 min)
    refactoring deyan (35 min)
  • Designing : Peko 15 mins
  • Implementing : Peko, Milo (done: 7h)
    • Review: 4 by todor. TCW is working correctly for now.
  • Testing :
PLUGIN_DECOMPOSITION_R0 - 5d - #95 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Deyan, Pacitu - 45 min
  • Analyzing Refactor : Pavlina - 45 mins
    • Review: 3.5 by Tanya - 30 min
  • Designing : Pavlina - 60 mins
    • Review: 3 by Tanya - 10 min
  • Implementing : Pavlina - 7d
    • Review : Peko - 4 - 10 mins 3.5 because of the fast switching from JPF to Apache Felix
  • Testing :
SCHEDULE_WBS_TIME_ALLOC_R0 - 3d - #1520 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pavlina, Todor(done: 15 mins)
  • Designing : Deyan(done:1h)
  • Implementing :Deyan(5d), :-Peko(545 mins)
    • Review : 3.5 by Tanya
  • Testing :
APP_MAIN_WINDOW_R0 - 2d - #381 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Tanya, todor - 35 min
    • Review: 3.5 by Pav - 10 mins

The links to the diagrams isn't working.

  • Designing : Peko 4h - done
  • Implementing : Peko 3.5h - done
    • Review: 4 by Pavlina - 20 mins
  • Testing :
SCS_REPO_MAINTENANCE_R0 - 0.5d - #1390 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pacitu ( done 10m )
  • Designing : Pacitu ( done 10m )
  • Implementing : Pacitu ( done 10m )
    • Review: 2 by todor. Task structure isn't correct, analysis need refactoring.
  • Implementing2: Pacitu
    • Review: 3 by todor. Now the task is fixed and it is according to the template.
SCHEDULE_WBS_DEPENDENCIES_R0 - 3d - #1516 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pavlina, Dean(done: 20 mins)
  • Analyzing 2 : Peko
  • Designing : Peko, Dean (10 mins)
  • Implementing : Peko - (440 mins)
  • Review: Milo - 2 - The page is not according to the template. Testing is not applicable. We dont have clear semantics about how depends transits for revisions. We dont have semantics what depends mean when defined for not bottom level tasks. There are problems with the dependencies, but they should be fixed in the next revision.
  • Testing : Peko - (10 mins)
  • Review2: Deyan - 3 - The page is fixed due to the template. In later revisions depends' transitions should be discussed and applied.
PLATFORM_STANDARDS_DESIGN_R0 - 1d - #27 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing :Pacitu, Deyan - 20 min
    • Review: 1 by Tanya. - The page is not according to the template. Analysis is incorrect. You should describe how to write design.
    • Refactoring: deyan 20 mins
    • Review: 4 by Tanya
  • Designing : Deyan (10 mins)
    • Review: 3 by Tanya. One of the points is a little incorrect. Design can be done by a QA or by a developer, it depends on the task itself. If it is for code writing for example, it must be done by a developer.
  • Implementing : Deyan (done 3 h)
    • Review: 2 by Tanya. Design template is not done.
    • Refactoring : Deyan (done 1.5 h) Discussed with Milo and decided that design template is not necessary.
    • Implementation Review: 4 - OK - Peko - 20 mins
  • Testing :
SCS_WIKI_SETUP_R0 - 0.5d - #1419 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Deyan (done: 15 mins)
    • Review: 3.5 by todor. How to demo section could be better, but it's good analysis after all.
  • Designing : Deyan (done: 15 mins)
    • Review: 4 by Pav. It is not mentioned that the sessions should end some time.
  • Implementing : Pacitu (done: 4h )
    • Review: 3.5 Deyan 20 mins Please fill in implementation task in the Implementing section of the log as it's needed for this revision's ticket closing.
  • Testing :
PLATFORM_NFR_EXTENSIBILITY_R0 - 0.5d - #58 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Dean, Pavlina(done: 20 mins)
    • Review: 2 by Tanya. The analysis should be more detailed. - 10min
  • Analyzing 2 : Pacitu ( done 10m )
    • Review: 2 by Tanya. Incorrect. You don't have to describe plugin architecture. - 5min
  • Designing : Pacitu ( done 10m ):
    • Review: 1 by Tanya. It is analysis not design. - 5min
  • Design2: todor
  • Implementing : Pacitu, Toshko ( done 30m )
  • Review: 3 by Deyan. Enough for R0, should be extended in later revisions.
  • Testing :
SCHEDULE_MAINTENANCE_R0 - 6d - #1522 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pavlina, Todor(done: 30 mins)
    • Review: 3.5 by Tanya. OK.
  • Designing : Pacitu (done: 30m)
  • Implementing :Pacitu
    • Review: 3.5 by todor. Maintenance of the schedule was done according to the rules. Some reports need to be fixed according to the template.
  • Testing :
PLATFORM_STANDARDS_AUTO_TESTS_R0 - 1d - #35 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Tanya, toshko - 15 min
  • Designing : Pavlina
  • Implementing : Pavlina
    • Review: 3 by tanya - 40 mins

Mark: 3
Much information is given and different kinds of test are clear explained (unit, integration, system).
But not all of the helper classes are written. For example there is not helper class for how to write Drag 'n' drop. There is not a list of all necessary helper classes.
Also, it is not clear how to write unit tests for GUI.
Bad estimate. 1 day is not enough for everything to be done.

INTERNAL_BACKLOG_STRUCTURE_R0 - 2d - #1549 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Tanya, toshko - 25 min + Tanya 20 min refactor
  • Designing : Tanya - 2h 10 min
  • Designing2: todor
  • Implementing : todor
    • Task review 2 points : Current task analysis, design and implementation presume that the Internal Backlog is different kinds of documents. If someone wants to see a part of it, he should look in the task's revision wiki page to determine where he should look for the information. I suggest creating a Wiki page named INTERNAL_BACKLOG? where all these links (google docs, wiki pages) should be linked with brief explanation what part of the backlog is stored there.
  • Implementing 2: todor
    • Task review 3 points : How to demo is not complete, Implementation section should contain more detailed information about implementation.
  • Implementing 3: Pac ( done 20m )
  • Testing :
SCS_PROJECT_BLOG_R0 - 1d - #1435 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pacitu ( done 10m )
  • Designing : Pacitu ( done 10m )
  • Implementing : Pavlina( done 30m )
    • Review: 3.5 by todor
  • Testing :
PLATFORM_STANDARDS_CODE_R0 - 1d - #31 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Tanya, toshko - 20 min + Tanya 20 min refactor
  • Designing : Tanya - 20 min
  • Implementing : Tanya
  • Review : 4 by Pavlina - 30 mins
  • Super Review: milo - 2 - Resulted in messy pages (some of them are incomplete). Should be restructured and include some of the things that were in PROCESS@8
  • Analyzing 2: Peko - done - 10 mins
  • Designing 2: Peko - refactored 5 mins.
  • Implementing 2 : Peko - done - 20 mins - NAME_CONVENTIONS removed. CODE_CONVENTIONS from SUN added.
    • Review: 3.5 by todor. The created wiki pages are good although some of they are not up-to-date.
  • Testing :
BOOK_WINDOW_R0 - 1d - #535 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pavlina, Dean(done: 25 mins)
    • Review: 1 by Tanya - 15min. The analysis does not apply to the template. This analysis does not describe what should be done for finishing the task. At least, it is incomplete.
    • Review: 3.5 by Tanya. Fix "How to demo".
    • Refactoring: Deyan (done: 25 minutes)
  • Designing : Pap, Peko
  • Implementing : Pavlina - 0.5d
  • Testing :
  • FAILED
SCHEDULE_WBS_TASKS_R0 - 3d - #1514 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pavlina, Todor(done: 10 mins)
    • Review: 2 by Tanya. The analysis doesn't apply to the template.
    • Analysis refactor: Deyan
  • Designing : Deyan
  • Implementing : Deyan(done:4h)
    This revision took only 5h, not 2d
    • Review: 4 by todor. The design and implementation are ok.
  • Testing :
SCHEDULE_WBS_EXPORTS_R0 - 3d - #1518 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Dean, Pavlina(done: 10 mins)
  • Designing : Pacitu, Peko(done: 60 mins)
  • Implementing : Pacitu,Peko(done: 60 mins)
    • Review: 3 by todor. Although this task passes there are some problems. The implementation of this task took too many resources that wasn't shown in the log of the task. There are some incorrect things in the analysis (about task juggler for example).
  • Testing :
PLATFORM_STANDARDS_REPOSITORY_R0 - 0.5d - #43 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pavlina, Dean(done: 20 mins)
    • Review: 2 by Tanya - 5 min. Some parts of the analysis are missing. For example "How to demo".
    • Refactoring : Deyan (done : 15 mins)
    • Review: 3 by Tanya. Fix "How to demo".
    • Refactoring : Deyan (done : 15 mins)
  • Designing : Pac
    • Review: 1 by Tanya - 10 min. First of all, here is the place where to write design review. Although, the design review which is written in the page of the task is correct. Remember when you fix the design to take it into consideration. And what is more, what you have written to be design actually applies more to implementation rather than to design - fixed.
    • Design review - the project MUST NOT be sophie-jr, since it is not jr anymore - fixed.
    • Review: 3 by Tanya - 10 min. OK.
  • Implementing : Pac(done:20 mins)
    • Review: 3.5 by Tanya - 10 min. OK.
  • Testing :
PLATFORM_NFR_COMPATIBILITY_R0 - 1d - #55 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Dean, Pavlina(done: 20 mins)
    • Review: 3,5 by Tanya - 10 min- How to demo is missing.
    • Refactoring : Deyan(done: 10 mins)
  • Designing :
    • Review: 4 by Tanya - 10 min - OK
  • Implementing : Tanya - 2h
    • Review: 3.5 by todor
  • Testing :
GLOBAL_SPEC_STRUCTURE_R0 - 2d - #1534 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Tanya, toshko - 25 min
  • Analysis Review: Peko - 3.5 - OK - 5 mins.
  • Designing : todor
  • Design Reivew: Peko - 4 - OK - 5 mins.
  • Implementing : todor
  • Implementation Review: Peko - 2 - Implementation and Design are inconsistent. Link for the structure wrong. - 10 mins
  • Implementation Reivew2: Peko - 4 - OK - 5 mins.
  • Testing :
SCS_MACHINE_SETUP_R0 - 2d - #1369 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Deyan (done: 35 min)
    • Review: 3 by todor. Needs better how to demo section.
  • Designing : Deyan
  • Implementing : Pacitu (done: 4h)
    • Review: 4 by Deyan (done: 20 min). Current setup is perfect for internal use. Probably later for external use should be set up another machine.
  • Testing :
BASE_MODEL_FRAME_CONTENT_R0 - 2d - #279 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pavlina, Dean(done: 25 mins)
    • Refactor: Tanya - 40 min
  • Designing : Tanya - 1h 10min
    • Review: 4 by todor
  • Implementing :
  • Testing :
  • FAILED
CORE_MVC_BASE_R0 - 4d - #216 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pap - done(30 min)
    • Refactor : Tanya - 40 min
  • Designing : Peko 1.5 h
  • Implementing : Peko 1.5h
  • Testing :
  • FAILED

PLATFORM_STANDARDS_GENERAL_R0 - 1d - #19 - (LOG)

  • Analyzing : Pavlina, Todor(done: 20 mins)
    • Review: 3.5 by Tanya
  • Designing : pap (done: 30 mins)
    • Review: 3 by Tanya
  • Implementing : Deyan (done : 5.5 h)
    • Review: 3.5 by Tanya
  • Testing :
GLOBAL_SPEC_MANAGING_R0 - 2d - #1537 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pavlina, Todor(done: 25 mins)
  • Analysis Review: 3 - ok Peko (5 mins)
  • Designing : todor
  • Design Review: 3 - ok Peko (5 mins)
  • Implementing : todor
  • Implementation Review: 2 - Peko (5 mins) - cannot be ready till the end of the sprint. All artifacts should be thoroughly reviewed.
  • Implementing2: todor. Some minor fixes in sophie 2 gui table and SRS. Thoroughly review of all current documents.
  • Implementation Review: 3 - Deyan (25 mins)
  • Testing :
PLUGIN_SUPPORT_LIB_BASE_R0 - 2d - #112 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pap - done(1:30h)
    • Review: 2 by Tanya. It doesn't apply to the template. It is not clear enough what should be done for finishing the task. - 5 min
  • Analyzing 2: Pap (20 min)
  • Designing : Pavlina - 20 mins
  • Implementing : Pavlina - 2d
    • Review : Peko - 3 - 10mins - In my opinion Design and Implementation are poor in terms of the wiki, which is the explanations and howtos. Should be fixed in next revision.
  • Testing :
PLATFORM_STRUCTURE_R0 - 2d - #4 - (LOG)
  • Analyzing : Pavlina, Todor(done: 15 mins)
    • Review: 2 by Tanya; Is the bullet "the structure should be applied" a part of this revision? If it is then the task result is incorrect. What does GLOSSARY include? It is not clear to me, so give examples. How to demo fails. - 15 min
  • Designing :Pavlina, Deyan
    • Review: 2 by todor. Analysis and design are inconsistent (where is GLOSSARY for example). Design looks unfinished, there is no explanation about the rules that PLATFORM_STRUCTURE should follow.
  • Design2: todor
  • Implementing : Pavlina - 20 mins
    • Review: 3 by todor. There are still some lack of correspondence between the analysis, design and implementation. But most of the work is done the flaws must be cleared in the next revision.
  • Testing :

All Related Tickets

#4
PLATFORM_STRUCTURE_R0
#11
PLATFORM_INFRASTRUCTURE_OVERVIEW_R0
#19
PLATFORM_STANDARDS_GENERAL_R0
#23
PLATFORM_STANDARDS_ANALYSIS_R0
#27
PLATFORM_STANDARDS_DESIGN_R0
#31
PLATFORM_STANDARDS_CODE_R0
#35
PLATFORM_STANDARDS_AUTO_TESTS_R0
#39
PLATFORM_STANDARDS_MANUAL_TESTS_R0
#43
PLATFORM_STANDARDS_REPOSITORY_R0
#55
PLATFORM_NFR_COMPATIBILITY_R0
#58
PLATFORM_NFR_EXTENSIBILITY_R0
#65
PLATFORM_DEPLOYMENT_BUILD_ECLIPSE_R0
#95
PLUGIN_DECOMPOSITION_R0
#104
PLUGIN_MODULE_STRUCTURE_R0
#108
PLUGIN_EDITIONS_STRUCTURE_R0
#112
PLUGIN_SUPPORT_LIB_BASE_R0
#129
PRO_LIB_CORE_TUTORIAL_R0
#216
CORE_MVC_BASE_R0
#254
BASE_BOUND_CONTROLS_R0
#279
BASE_MODEL_FRAME_CONTENT_R0
#381
APP_MAIN_WINDOW_R0
#535
BOOK_WINDOW_R0
#1365
SCS_SITE_DESIGN_R0
#1369
SCS_MACHINE_SETUP_R0
#1373
SCS_BACKUP_R0
#1390
SCS_REPO_MAINTENANCE_R0
#1402
SCS_REPO_MIGRATE_R0
#1404
SCS_ISSUE_TRACKER_SETUP_R0
#1407
SCS_ISSUE_TRACKER_MAINTENANCE_R0
#1419
SCS_WIKI_SETUP_R0
#1423
SCS_WIKI_MAINTENANCE_R0
#1435
SCS_PROJECT_BLOG_R0
#1447
SCS_FORUM_R0
#1459
SCS_MAIL_LIST_R0
#1471
SCS_TEST_TRACKING_SETUP_R0
#1474
SCS_TEST_TRACKING_MAINTENANCE_R0
#1514
SCHEDULE_WBS_TASKS_R0
#1516
SCHEDULE_WBS_DEPENDENCIES_R0
#1518
SCHEDULE_WBS_EXPORTS_R0
#1520
SCHEDULE_WBS_TIME_ALLOC_R0
#1522
SCHEDULE_MAINTENANCE_R0
#1534
GLOBAL_SPEC_STRUCTURE_R0
#1537
GLOBAL_SPEC_MANAGING_R0
#1549
INTERNAL_BACKLOG_STRUCTURE_R0
#1552
INTERNAL_BACKLOG_MAINTENANCE_R0
#1564
PROCESS_R0